“Your success is your worst enemy.”

I quoted to this piece by Michael Lopp back on June 28, but I’m quoting it again:

Your success is delicious. Others look at your success and think, “Well, duh, it’s so obvious what they did there – anyone can do that” and, frustratingly so, they’re right. Your success has given others a blueprint for what success looks like, and while, yes, the devil’s in the details, you have performed a lot of initial legwork for your competition in the process of becoming successful.

More bad news via metaphors. Your enticing success has your competition chasing you, and that means that, by definition, that they need to run harder and faster than you so they can catch up. Yes, many potential competitors are going to bungle the execution and vanish before they pose a legitimate threat but there’s a chance someone will catch up, and when they do, what’s their velocity? Faster than yours.

Shit.

As sucky as it is to watch HP copy the design of the iMac, and Samsung copy the design of the iPhone and iOS (and their retail stores and their dock connectors and everything else) and Jeff Bezos copy Steve Jobs’ presentation style to introduce the new Kindles (last year and this year)—none of these companies will be able to create anything better by copying.
Things get interesting once you leave the copying phase and start mutating ideas to fit your vision. All of these companies copying Apple are acting like me in design school, when I imitated my favorite painters and sculptors and designers while I developed my own artistic vision.
The problem with Apple’s competitors is most of them seem to have no interest in developing their own vision and that is unfortunate because we could have a much more diverse and creative spectrum of technology products on the market right now.

Categories:

Innovation

Tags:

Perception & Naming

Quick thought: Does the fact that we call programs on mobile devices ‘apps’ have any correlation to how cheap people become when debating buying one for $2.99?
By truncating the word application, I wonder if it loses some of its weight and professionalism. It’s like the difference between taxi and limousine.
People have no idea what goes into some of their favorite and best built ‘apps’. The testing, the QA, the underlying databases and coding.
No idea at all.

Categories:

Technology

Tags:

Long In The Tooth

Further evidence that iTunes is getting long in the tooth:
stopped_updating.jpg
The above alert window is confusing because I listen to multiple podcasts on my iPhone via the new-ish Podcasts application Apple dropped earlier this year and iTunes should know this and mark the ones I have listened to as ‘played’.

Categories:

Human Experience

Tags:

A Material Portal

Over at The Verge, Tim Carmody reacts to The Kindle Fire:

“The Kindle Fire,” he added, “is a service. It offers 22 million items. It calls you by name. It makes recommendations for you.” Bezos was talking about the Kindle Fire as if it were Amazon itself: the entire retail and technological experience made manifest in a single device. The future of Amazon, he seemed to be saying, isn’t the website; it’s this material portal, and others like it.

Echoes my reaction from a few days ago. The Kindle Fire is Amazon incarnate—a vessel for buying more stuff. The same as the iPad is Apple incarnate—a best-of-breed, general purpose tablet computer, designed for everything from productivity tasks to watching movies to listening to music.
There’s a good deal of overlap in what you can do on both devices, but the focus is different. To the average person, this difference in focus might seem very subtle, but to me it’s extremely important.
It reminds me of the phrase (which I believe Steve Jobs said, but I can’t find a source): “We don’t design products to make money, we make money so we can design products.”

Categories:

Business

Tags: