Hitchcock movies as GIFs. Wish they were bigger.

Patrick Lehoux created a tool that lets you cut soda, beer and wine bottles into glasses.
Given that I only buy wines these days based on their labels (and most of you wouldn’t know the difference in a blind tasting), I really need this tool.

History is awesome. Particularly New York history.
via PSFK

This is how you do a business card:


Gorgeous.
via ShareSomeCandy

rethinkdigg.com:

As betaworks and Digg both announced on their blogs, we are taking over Digg and turning it back into a startup. What they didn’t mention is that we’re rebuilding it from scratch. In six weeks.

Everyone always loves a good comeback story. Like a rocker coming back strong from rehab.
Let’s see if the new Digg team has what it takes.

MG Siegler on Microsoft’s first ever quarterly loss:

I think what we’re seeing in Microsoft’s numbers right now is the full-on shift of the company towards enterprise. To be clear, I think the company will remain alive and probably even thrive in that regard for a long time. I just think the time of their consumer dominance is already over. And within the next decade, it will be completely over.

I think at that point, Microsoft will be an enterprise software and services company with a strange, but successful gaming sub-division that will probably be spun off by then.

He’s right. The thing is, Microsoft has never been a consumer-focused company to begin with. Windows was designed for businesses, not people. Microsoft got in good early in the enterprise market in the 80’s and 90’s and that trickled down to peoples’ home computers. “I have Windows at the office, I might as well get it for home.” That left Apple out in the cold until Steve Jobs came back in 1998.
Computer component miniaturization made huge strides since the first Macintosh went on the market in 1984. So while the first iMac was a smash hit when it debuted, portable computing was Apple’s Trojan horse to reclaim dominance. First the iPod. Then the iPhone. Then the iPad. Windows PC spread from the office to the home. In the past 10 years we’ve seen the opposite: Apple products are going from the home to the office.
And this is why Microsoft is in a jam. They’ve never had to market to people until now. OK, they tried with the Zune, but it was pathetic (they peaked their market share at around 3%). And the XBox division? Chump change to Microsoft’s bottom line. If they had to rely on just Xbox division revenue to keep the company afloat, Microsoft would be about 20 people working out of a Starbucks.
In addition to Window 8 being their first real attempt to sell to people, they’re also introducing a version of Windows that completely deviates from past versions (except when it doesn’t). Microsoft has built Windows on the strength of its legacy support. So they’re selling to people while simultaneously pissing off people at the companies who they rely on to upgrade to new versions of Windows.
What a mess. I can only imagine the stress and chaos and madness going on at that company right now.

The Internet is asking Marissa Mayer, the new CEO of Yahoo, to make Flickr awesome again (via Daring Fireball).
I just got an email from Flickr telling me my PRO account is expiring on August 1. I’ve paid for my PRO account since 2005 but I’m seriously debating if paying for Flickr is still worth it. If you compare the Flickr of 2005 to the Flickr of 2012 the changes are marginal.

Fortune: Apple granted ‘the mother of all smartphone software patents’:

Both sides of the smartphone wars agree that the 25 patents granted Apple (AAPL) on Tuesday contain some powerful legal weapons.

One patent in particular — No. 8,223,134: “Portable electronic device, method, and graphical user interface for displaying electronic lists and documents” — stands out.

I was ready to use the Obi-Wan line, ‘If you strike me down I shall become more power than you can possibly imagine’, but I realized, Apple is already there. More importantly, Apple doesn’t need this patent to continue it’s trajectory of success.

Derek Thompson over at the Atlantic shares 11 ways consumers are hopeless at math (via Flowing Data):

You walk into a Starbucks and see two deals for a cup of coffee. The first deal offers 33% extra coffee. The second takes 33% off the regular price. What’s the better deal?

“They’re about equal!” you’d say, if you’re like the students who participated in a new study published in the Journal of Marketing. And you’d be wrong. The deals appear to be equivalent, but in fact, a 33% discount is the same as a 50 percent increase in quantity. Math time: Let’s say the standard coffee is $1 for 3 quarts ($0.33 per quart). The first deal gets you 4 quarts for $1 ($0.25 per quart) and the second gets you 3 quarts for 66 cents ($.22 per quart).

If you’re like me and fascinated by behavioral economics, I suggest you read Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely.

A beautifully produced short film with team members at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory on the challenges of getting to Mars.
via Public School